OTHER AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLAINTS FILED BY EMAIL DATED DECEMBER 20, 2021 (PST/PSD):
)
) S. S.
)
X----------------------------X
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLAINTS ON FRAUDULENT ONLINE REBATES AND COMMISSIONS PLATFORM
AND BREACHES, HARRASHMENTS, ET. AL.
KNOW BY ALL CREATURES BY THIS PRESENCE/PRESENT WORLDWIDELY/NATIONALLY/INTERNATIONALLY/UNIVERSALLY:
FROM ME AS THE LEGAL STATE/GOVERNMENT PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINANT VICTIM
(CUSTOMER)(PART TIME WORKER) (INVESTOR):
MISTER
EDWIN BALATBAT DIMAANO THE BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ACCOUNTANCY (B.S.A.) WITH
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (M.B.A.) AND THE JOBLESS HOMEBASE
FREELANCE INDEPENDENT GENERAL CONTRACTOR......, (UNIVERSAL/INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESSMAN FOR PERSONAL BUSINESS CLAIMS AND INVESTMENTS) PART TIMER/FREELANCER
A MAN STRAIGHT OF LAWFUL, FAIR, RIGHTEOUS AND LEGAL ADULT MAJORITY AGE WITH
DATE OF BIRTH ON DECEMBER 28, 1977,
A REGISTERED FILIPINO CITIZEN/NATIONALITY AS A BRITISH CAUCASIAN/EURASIAN PER
MIXES OF MY RACES: AUSTRALIAN AS BRITISH THAT MAY AS ALSO WITH UNITED KINGDOM
RACE OF WHICH BRITISH MAY AS ALSO AS AMERICAN, GERMAN AS EUROPEAN THAT MAY AS
ALSO WITH SPANISH/SPANIARD RACE, CHINESE FILIPINO AS ASIAN THAT MAY AS ALSO AS
WITH CAMBODIAN RACE...... ETC., ETC.,
THAT AS PER MY CIVIL STATUS, I AM JUSTS A MAN STRAIGHT ADULT INDEPENDENT
POLYGAMOUS SINGLE LAWFUL NATURAL HUSBAND BIOLOGICAL FATHER ALREADY, WHETHER
DECLARED AS MARRIED BY SOME OF MY WIVES PER MRS. AS NOTED I BEING AS A HUSBAND
AND A BIOLOGICAL FATHER OF OUR OWN BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN, AS NATURALLY MARRIED BY
CIRCUMSTANCES, THUS, AS WHETHER DECLARED AS UNMARRIED PER SOME OF MY WIVES AS
SINGLE MOTHERS AS I BEING BIOLOGICAL FATHER OF OUR OWN BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN, OR
AS SINGLE PER MY WIVES AS INDEPENDENT QUEENS/MOTHERS BUT AS ALSO MY EVER
DEAREST BEAUTIFUL FIANCEE NATURAL WIFE PRINCESS MISS AS MULTIPLY PER EVEN OF
HOW MANY OF THEM...... (........X#........) THEREFORE, AS OF THE MEANTIME, MY
FAMILY IS UNCOUNTABLE OR COULD NOT BE MEASURE EXACTLY OF HOW MANY ARE OUR
MEMBERS OF OUR NATURAL AND BIOLOGICAL FAMILY PER OUR OWN GENERATIONS AS A WHOLE......
BUT THEN, I AM ENGAGED FOR OUR MARRIAGE PER EACH AND ANY OF MY FIANCEES WHO ARE
AVAILABLES TO MARRIES ME......,
WITH RESIDENCE HOME ADDRESS AT DIMAANO RESIDENCE AT 0663 (E222)
(PUROK 4) SAN MIGUEL, HAGONOY, BULACAN, PHILIPPINES 3002,
THE ATTORNEY IN FACT/AGENT/EXECUTIVE/BROKER/MARKETER/BUSINESSMAN
ABOUT FINANCIAL MARKETS, ETC., ETC. (INDEPENDENT FOR BUSINESS PLAN) (FREELANCER)
CAREER SERVICE PROFESSIONAL 13040254, C.S.C. N.C.R. 12.15.1998,
CAREER SERVICE SUB-PROFESSIONAL 13040254, C.S.C . N.C.R.
11.12.1977,
PVT FROM FEU NCR RCDG RESCOM, PA, 03.10.1996 STANDBY RESERVIST (
S.R.),
C/MAJ FROM SACHS (BUL) 304 CDC, 3RCDU, RESCOM , PA, 03.18.1994
STANDBY RESERVIST ( S.R.),
THE AFFIANT LEGAL GOVERNMENT/STATE PRIVATE COMPLAINANT, JUST THE
AD HOC ATTORNEY IN FACT AT LAW OF MY OWN COMPLAINTS BEFORE/PRIOR THE FISCALS/
OMBUDS/PROSECUTORS/MILITARIES, AND MOREOVER, ETC., ETC.,
ALSO IN REFERENCES OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AS A WHOLE ABOUT MY POSTS
ON
HTTP://WWW.EBRADLEIAFFIDAVITOFCOMPLAINTS.BLOGSPOT.COM
AND
HTTPS://WEB.FACEBOOK.COM/MR.EDWIN.BALATBAT.DIMAANO.LEGAL
INCLUDING REFERENCE OF CASES EMPHASIS OF INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTIONS
AS SUCH CASES AS YOU MAY FURTHER READ AS POSTED ON:
HTTP://WWW.EBRADLEIINTERNATIONALJURISDICTIONS.BLOGSPOT.COM
WITH ID PHOTO CARD NOT/NONE EXPIRING SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM
NUMBER: 33-4168784-6.
THE AFFIANT PRIVATE COMPLAINANT, JUST THE ADHOC ATTORNEY IN FACT
AT LAW OF MY OWN COMPLAINTS BARELY BEFORE/PRIOR THE OMBUDS, FISCALS,
PROSECUTORS, POLICEMEN/POLICEWOMEN, ARMIES, MILITARIES, ETC., ETC. ...... AND
MORE OVER AS MAY MEAN NECESSARY...... (MAY/MUST BE CARES ALSO BY AN ATTORNEY AT
LAW)
- VERSUS -
SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. - SKY - (GBM COMPRAS)
-ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM
COMPANY IS LOCATED AT ROOM 1802, 18TH FLOOR, COAST HOTEL, PASAY
CITY, MANILA.
REPRESENTED BY HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER - ONLINE CUSTOMER
SERVICE SPECIALIST ANITA DE SILVA Y VELASQUEZ
AND TRIGAALTMAN
CRIMES CASES:
FRAUDS, BREACHES, HARRASHMENTS, BIASED/UNLAWFUL ARBITRATIONS,
UNLAWFUL PROFITEERING, THREATS, ET. AL.
THAT I, MISTER EDWIN BALATBAT DIMAANO, FILIPINO, OF LAWFUL, FAIR, RIGHTEOUS
AND LEGAL MAJORITY AGE WITH MY DATE OF BIRTH ON DECEMBER 28, 1977, THE BACHELOR
OF SCIENCE IN ACCOUNTANCY WITH MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND
THE HOMEBASE FREELANCE INDEPENDENT GENERAL CONTRACTOR............ OF DIMAANO
RESIDENCE AT 0663 (E222) (PUROK 4) SAN MIGUEL, HAGONOY, BULACAN, PHILIPPINES
3002, SWEAR AND SUBSCRIBE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW, STATES THE
FOLLOWING:
1. THAT AFTER
SOME TOPS UPS RECHARGES OF SOME MONEY TO THE PLATFORM, THE CUSTOMER SERVICE
KEEP INSISTING TO TOPS UPS FOR ADDITIONAL RECHARGES THAT FRAUDS STARTED TO
TRICK AND FOOL THE CUSTOMER AFTER RECHARGES SOME MONEY THAT THE ONLINE MALL
TASK PLATFORM FOR REBATES AND COMMISIONS WERE WRONGFULLY MANIPULATED.
 |
EXHIBIT 1.A.: FIRST TOP UP OF ₱200.00PHP FOR TASKING EXPERIENCE, BUT TRICKEN EXPERIENCED THAT SUCH TASKING ORDER MAY IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAWN THE RECHARGED MONEY AFTER WITH REBATE AND COMMISSION AS ALSO INSTRUCTED BY THE ONLINE CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST WITHOUT FURTHER SURPRISED AND UNEXPECTED RULE. BUT FRAUDS AND BREACHES FOLLOWED LATER ON.
 |
EXHIBIT 1.B.: FOLLOWED EXPERIENCED.
2. THE MONEY WAS DECREASED AND STUCKED AT FIRST
CAUSED BY MULTIPLE ORDERS AND OVERPRICED ORDER, THE BALANCE BECAME LESS THAN OF
WHAT HAS BEEN RECHARGED FOR VIRTUAL PURCHASING DEPOSIT:
EXHIBIT 2.A.:
 |
3. THE AVAILABLE BALANCE WAS LESS THAN THE
AMOUNT OF NEW ORDER THAT FOLLOWED CAUSED BY OVERPRICED AND UNRETURNED PRINCIPALS
AND COMMISSIONS:
 |
EXHIBIT 3.A.:
3.1.
THUS,
IT IS THE COMPANY’S WEAKNESSES AND INHUMANITIES THAT THEY COULD NOT ALSO BE
READY FOR LIQUIDATION IF THEIR CUSTOMER INSIST WITHDRAWAL AND NEEDED THE MONEY.
IN FACT, THEY INFORMED THAT THE MERCHANT DISTRIBUTED THE REMAINING TASKS TO
OTHERS, BUT THE COMPANY DID NOT PROVIDE WITHDRAWAL FOR THE CUSTOMER, DID NOT
ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT MAY HAPPEN IF TO QUIT, INSTEAD THEY FRAUDED
AND BREACHED WITH UNLAWFUL HARRASHMENTS OF REPEATEDLY FORCIBLE TOPS UPS AS
BEING FOOLED AFTER TASK COMPLETION REPEATEDLY.
 |
EXHIBIT 3.B.:
4. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT VIOLATE ANY RULE, THUS,
SUCH RULE WAS SURPRISED AND UNEXPECTED, AS RULE WITHOUT PER FIRST TASKING
EXPERIENCE DONE, THAT IS ALSO UNFAIR, WHATEVER, EVEN THE OVERPRICED WITH
UNRETURNED PRINCIPALS AND COMMISSIONS WAS BARELY WAITED BY THE CUSTOMER OF WHAT
MAY HAPPEN AND IF MAY BE FROZEN, WHETHER SUCH RULE REGARDING OVERPRICING AND
FROZING ARE FAIR OR UNFAIR. UNTIL THE CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMED THAT SOMEBODY
ELSE DID ON THE CUSTOMER’S ACCOUNT:
EXHIBIT 4.A.:
 |
5. IT APPEARED LATER ON THAT NOBODY ELSE DID THE
TASK OF THE CUSTOMER, THAT WAS FRAUD ALREADY, AS THE PENDING ORDER WAS BARELY
CLAIMED BY THE MERCHANT AND RETURNED THE EARLIER COMMISSIONS AND PRINCIPALS,
BUT THE CUSTOMER COULD NOT WITHDRAW HIS FUND:
EXHIBIT 5.A.:
 |
 |
EXHIBIT 5.B.: NO ANSWER OF CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST IF THE CUSTOMER MAY QUIT.
 |
EXHIBIT 5.C.: CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST KEEP ASKING TOPS UPS RECHARGES, THUS, OF ₱1,700.00PHP FOR VIRTUAL PURCHASING DEPOSIT, IT TURNED ₱500.00PHP FOR SECURTY DEPOSIT TO WITHDRAW THE MONEY, BUT LATER ON WAS FRAUDED AND WAS BREACHED.
 |
EXHIBIT 5.D.: THE PENDING ORDER THAT WAS FROZEN CAUSED BY SURPRISED AND UNEXPECTED RULE THREATENED AS A VIOLATION OF SUCH RULE INSTEAD OF BARELY INCOMPLETED TASK ORDER. THUS, THE MONEY OF THE CUSTOMER WAS AND IS GREATER THAN THE SECURTY DEPOSIT INSISTED, BUT WAS NOT DEDUCTED, INSTEAD THEY INSISTED ANOTHER TOP UP RECHARGE FOR SECURITY DEPOSIT TO APPLY FOR 10 MINUTES DEFROSTING FOR UNFREEZING FUNDS.
6. THE AVAILABLE BALANCE TOGETHER WITH THE BONUS
IS ₱1,270+284.10 EQUIVALENT TO ₱1,554.10 AND THE CUSTOMER ASKED TO DEDUCT THE ASKING ₱500 SECURITY
DEPOSIT JUST TO WITHDRAW, BUT NOT WITHDRAWN.
 |
EXHIBIT 6.A.:
7. THE MONEY REMAIN/LEFT STUCKED ON THE PLATFORM
ACCOUNT THAT COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN EVENTHOUGH THE CUSTOMER DID NOT VIOLATE ANY
RULE, AS SUCH TERMINOLOGY FOR UNLAWFUL, UNFAIR, UNRIGHTEOUS AND ILLEGAL COMPANY
RULE WAS DISGRACE AND THREATENING, THUS, NON-RECHARGE IMMEDIATELY MUST NOT MEAN
A VIOLATION IF THE CUSTOMER IS NOT READY TO TOP UP ANOTHER MONEY FOR RECHARGE,
AS IT IS UNLAWFUL FORCIBLE BUYING OF ORDER, THUS, THE ORDER OF THE PRODUCTS AVAILABLE
FOR VIRTUAL BUYING BEING THEN INFORMED AS AUTOMATED, RHUS, NOT ON THE CONTROL
OF THE CUSTOMER EVEN OF WHICHEVER PRODUCT MAY BE AVAILABLE WITH THE UNKNOWN PRICE,
THUS, MUST NOT MEAN TO BE DECEITED, AS IF THERE BARELY OBJECTIVE IS FOR
PRODUCTS RANKING, PROMOTIONS AND SALES WITH EFFICIENCY, THEY WOULD NOT GO OVER
WITH OVERPRICING.
7.1. THAT AS IT
WAS BARELY BEING INFORMED AS FOR A PART TIME WORKER, MORE OF INDUSTRIES/INDUSTRIOUSNESS
OF THE WORKER, BUT IT BECAME MONEY INVESTMENT, THE CUSTOMER CONTINUED AS IT IS
A FORM OF REBATES AND COMMISIONS, PER ACTUAL SAMPLE EXPERIENCE COULD BE
WITHDRAWN IMMEDIATELY AS VERY LIQUID, BUT ALSO DECEITED WITHOUT RISK, AS IT
TURNED OUT AS HIGH RISK AS THE MONEY INVESTED FOR REBATES WITH COMMISSIONS PROVIDED
BY THE MERCHANTS WERE STUCKED AND FROZEN, INSTEAD OF TIME CONSTRAINS FOR
COMPLETION OF TASKS, BUT TURNED OUT AS ALSO MONEY CONSTRAINS, AS BEYOND THE
CONTROL OF THE VIRTUAL BUYER OR THE CUSTOMER WHICH IS UNLAWFUL, UNFAIR,
UNRIGHTEOUS AND ILLEGAL.
7.2. THAT ANY
FINAL INTERPRETATION MUST MEAN LAWFUL, FAIR, RIGHTEOUS AND LEGAL, WITHOUT
VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ANY INTERPRETATION INTENDED WITH DECEITED FRAUDS AND
BREACHES ARE UNLAWFUL, UNFAIR, UNRIGHTEOUS AND ILLEGAL, AS CRIMES COMMITTED BY
THE COMPANY.
7.3. MOREOVER,
THE COMPANY AS THE GBM COMPRAS – SKY – SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. –
ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM WILL NOT PAY FOR LOSS AND DAMAGES TO THE MERCHANTS IF
THEY ARE OPERATING LAWFUL AND LEGALLY, THE CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST MENTIONED
AS SUCH LOSS AND DAMAGES, NOW, THEY MUST PAY LOSS AND DAMAGES TO THE VIRTUAL
BUYER OR THE CUSTOMER OR THE PART TIME WORKER OR THE INVESTOR PER SUCH OF
CHARGES OF CRIMES THAT THE COMPANY COMMITTED, WHETHER THE COMPANY PAY LOSS AND
DAMAGES OR DID NOT PAY TO THE MERCHANT/S, WHETHER INTENDED AS ALSO A FORM OF OBLIGATORY
INTIMIDATION, IT CAUSED UNLAWFUL ARBITRATION BY NEGLECTING THE RIGHTS ALSO OF
THE VIRTUAL BUYER OR THE CUSTOMER OR THE PART TIME WORKER OR THE INVESTOR.
7.4. THE CUSTOMER
MAY EVEN GO BACK PATRONIZING AS A PART TIMER IF THEY ALLOWED WITHDRAWAL OF THE MONEY
OF THE CUSTOMER, IF THEY ARE GOOD ON THEIR CUSTOMER, THAT MUST BE USUAL, BUT
THE HARRASHMENTS OF THE MORE THE TASKS THE MORE THE COMMISSIONS AS INSISTED
REPEATEDLY BY THE CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST WERE INTOLERABLE AND INSISTED THAT
THE MONEY COULD BE WITHDRAWN AFTER TOP UP AND TASK COMPLETION REPEATEDLY EVERYTIME
OVERPRICING APPEARED WERE ALSO INTOLERABLE, AS SUCH WERE HARRASHMENTS AND UNLAWFUL
PROFITEERING.
 |
EXHIBIT 7.A.:
8. THAT A CLEAR EVIDENCE OF FRAUD THAT IF THE
CUSTOMER RECHARGE FOR SECURITY DEPOSIT THERE IS NO TASK REQUIRED, BUT THE ORDER
FOLLOWED THAT WAS BECAME MANY TASKS ORDERS ALSO WITH OVERPRICED AS FRAUDS AND
BREACHES ON THE PART OF THE SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. REPRESENTED BY
THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST. THUS, THE MONEY COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN.
 |
EXHIBIT 8.A.:
9. THAT THE FOLLOWING TOPS UPS WERE DONE AND THE
CUSTOMER COULD NOT WITHDRAW THE MONEY LEFT ON THE PLATFORM.
 |
EXHIBIT 9.A.:
 |
EXHIBIT 9.B.:
EXHIBIT 9.C.:
 |
10.
THE
TEN MINUTES DEFROSTING TOOK MORE THAN HALF A DAY UNTIL THE CUSTOMER GOT ANSWER FROM
THE SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND THE CUSTOMER
SERVICE SPECIALIST BREACHED THAT THERE IS NO TASK ORDER REQUIRED AFTER SECURTY
DEPOSIT FOR WITHDRAWAL THAT BECAME PURCHASING DEPOSIT FOLLOWED BY MANY TASKS
ORDERS THAT FOOLED THE CUSTOMER, THUS, SUCH INFORMED AS LAST ORDER FAILED THAT WAS
FOLLOWED BY NEXT ANOTHER ORDERS.
 |
EXHIBIT 10.A.:
11.
THE
CUSTOMER HAS NOTHING TO DO BUT TO CONTINUE AS THE SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO.
LTD. DID NOT PROVIDE SUCH WITHDRAWAL REQUESTED/ASKED BY THE CUSTOMER.
 |
EXHIBIT 11.A.:
12.
ANOTHER
₱700.00PHP WAS TOP UP AS A RECHARGE TO COMPLETE THE TASK AND WITHDRAW THE MONEY
ON THE ACCOUNT BUT NO WITHDRAWAL COULD BE MADE BY THE CUSTOMER.
EXHIBIT 12.A.:
 |
13.
THE
AVAILABLE BALANCE ON THE ACCOUNT EARLIER IS ₱2,054.10PHP.
 |
EXHIBIT 13.A.:
14.
WHILE
THE NEW TASK ORDER WAS OVERPRICED AS ₱2,749.00PHP THAT BREACHED AND A CLEAR EVIDENCE
OF FRAUD WITH WRONGFUL MANIPULATIONS.
EXHIBIT 14.A.:
 |
15.
THAT
ANOTHER CLEAR EVIDENCES OF FRAUDS ARE THE SAMPLE THAT EARLIER WAS THE TASK TO
BE COMPLETED APPEARED AS FRACTIONAL 2/6 FOR 2 TASKS DONE OF 6 TASKS BUT WAS TRICKEN
THE CUSTOMER AS 2/2, MUST HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, BUT THEN BECAME 3/3 AND THEN 4/4
AS SUPPOSED NO OTHER TASKS, BUT AS WAS ASKED TO CONTINUE BY THE CUSTOMER
SERVICE SPECIALIST AS THE LAST TO COMPLETE BUT IT FAILED AND FAILED, ET. AL. AS
ANOTHER CAUSED OF FRAUDS AND BREACHES.
 |
EXHIBIT 15.A.:
16.
THAT
SUCH EALIER BASIS MADE THE CUSTOMER NOT READY AS IT MAY NEED MORE BUDGET, BUT
AS IT WAS BEING PROMISED BY THE SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. BY THE
CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST AS NO TASK REQUIRED ANYMORE, THE CUSTOMER NEED
MONEY AND USED SUCH MONEY TO WITHDRAW MONEY FROM THE PLATFORM ACCOUNT BUT THE
COMPANY BREACHES AND FRAUDS BY CHATS AND PLATFORM.
 |
EXHIBIT 16.A.: AS SUCH BECAME 3/3.
17.
THE
CUSTOMER REMAIN INSISTED TO WITHDRAW, BUT BARELY ASKED FOR ADDITIONAL TOP UP
FOR ADDITIONAL RECHARGE, ALTHOUGH ALL TASKS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED EARLIER.
 |
EXHIBIT 17.A.:
 |
EXHIBIT 17.B.:
EXHIBIT 17.C.:
 |
 |
EXHIBIT 17.D.:
 |
EXHIBIT 17.E.:
18.
BUT
THE CUSTOMER STILL COULD NOT WITHDRAW HIS MONEY ON THE PLATFORM.
EXHIBIT 18.A.:
 |
19.
THUS,
WHATEVER IT TAKES, THE ₱500.00 SECURTY DEPOSIT ASKED WAS EVEN TRIED TO LEFT
UPON WITHDRAWAL IF ₱4,025.80PHP BARELY BUT STILL COULD NOT WITHDRAW WITH THE AVAILABLE
BALANCE OF ₱4,525.80PHP.
 |
EXHIBIT 19.A.:
20.
AS
THE SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. APPEARED THAT THE MONEY OF THE CUSTOMER
WOULD NOT LIKE TO GIVE UP, BARELY ASKED AND ASKED FOR ADDITIONAL TOPS UPS OF
MONEY BY THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE FOR RECHARGES TO MAKE A
WITHDRAWAL, THE CUSTOMER MADE ANOTHER TRY AS IT APPEARED ANOTHER TASK AFTER THE
CUSTOMER WAS ASKED TO REFRESH THE PLATFORM WHICH COUNTS ANOTHER FRAUDED AND
BREACHED.
 |
EXHIBIT 20.A.:
21.
ANOTHER
TOP UP OF MONEY WAS RECHARGED BY THE CUSTOMER.
EXHIBIT 21.A.:
 |
22.
IT
REVEALED 4/4 TASK, BUT THE MONEY REMAIN/STILL COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN, EVEN IF
NO PENDING ORDER.
 |
EXHIBIT 22.A.:
23.
IT
REVEALED 4/4 TASK, BUT THE MONEY REMAIN/STILL COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN, EVEN IF
NO FROZEN ORDER.
 |
EXHIBIT 23.A.:
24.
IT
REVEALED 4/4 TASK, BUT THE MONEY REMAIN/STILL COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN, EVEN IF
ALL ORDERS ARE COMPLETED WITH BALANCE ALREADY OF ₱6,890.80PHP.
 |
EXHIBIT 24.A.:
 |
EXHIBIT 24.B.:
25.
THE
AVAILABLE BALANCE ON THE PLATFORM ACCOUNT AS ₱6,890.80PHP.
 |
EXHIBIT 25.A.:
26.
BUT
STILL/REMAIN THAT THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF ₱6,890.80PHP COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN
BY THE CUSTOMER.
EXHIBIT 26.A.:
 |
27.
EVEN
JUST THE AMOUNT OF ₱6,300.00PHP WITHDRAWAL CONSIDERING THE AMOUNT TO LEFT FOR
SECURTY DEPOSIT OF ₱500.00PHP.
 |
EXHIBIT 27.A.:
28.
UNENDING
TOPS UPS OF MONEY FOR RECHARGES FOR ADDITIONAL TASKS ORDERS WERE REPEATED
BARELY WITH OVERPRICED TASK ORDER THAT THE CUSTOMER STOPPED AND COMPLAINTS
ALREADY CONSIDERING ANOTHER OVERPRICED TASK ORDER APPEARED AGAIN AS ANOTHER
COUNT OF FRAUDS AND BREACHES.
 |
EXHIBIT 28.A.:
29.
THE
CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST/REPRESENTATIVE/HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER BY SMS/TEXT NUMBER
+639705689276 MESSAGE AS SHE INTRODUCED WITH THE NUMBERS AS ALSO ON WHATSAPP
ARE +639691264176 AND +639691264041.
 |
EXHIBIT 29.A.:
30.
THE
COMPANY PROFILE THAT WAS EARLIER INTRODUCED AS GBM COMPRAS BY THE CUSTOMER
SERVICE SPECIALIST/REPRESENTATIVE ANITA DE SILVA Y VELASQUEZ WITH HER WHATSAPP
NUMBER +63 969 126 4176 AND AS +63 969 126 4041 FROM THE WEBSITE URL PROVIDED
AS http://philippine1.com/#/register?code=Q8R79O IS WITH THE FOLLOWING SCREENSHOTS AS SKY OR
AS THE SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD..
 |
EXHIBIT 30.A.:
 |
EXHIBIT 30.B.:
EXHIBIT 30.C.:
 |
31.
THE
COMPANY IS BEING INFORMED AS LOCATED AT ROOM 1802, 18th FLOOR, COAST
HOTEL, PASAY CITY, MANILA AS BEING INFORMED WITH THE ID OF THE CUSTOMER SERVICE
SPECIALIST/REPRESENTATIVE ANITA DE SILVA Y VELASQUEZ.
EXHIBIT 31.A.:
 |
EXHIBIT 31.B.:
CERTIFICATE PROVIDED AS ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM WITHOUT THE NAME OF GBM
COMPRAS NOR SKY NOR SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD..
 |
32.
THAT
AFTER SOME TIME THE WEBSITE URL/LINK PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER SERVICE
SPECIALIST AS THE URL http://philippine1.com/#/register?code=Q8R79O COULD NOT BE OPENED.
 |
EXHIBIT 32.A.:
33.
THE
CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST PROVIDED ANOTHER WEB LINK AS https://philippine8.com/#/register?code=EI5HPH ASKING ME TO REGISTER FOR A NEW ACCOUNT
WHILE MY OLD ACCOUNT COULD NOT BE OPENED.
 |
EXHIBIT 33.A.:
34.
BUT
THE CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST ASKED THE CUSTOMER TO OPEN A NEW ACCOUNT AND CHATTED
LATER ON THAT THE MONEY FROM OLD ACCOUNT WILL THEN TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NEW
ACCOUNT, THE CUSTOMER DID NOT USE THE EARLIER NUMBER AS NOT TO BE CONFUSED AND
NOT TO COVER/REPLACE THE EXISTING ACCOUNT, THE NEW ACCOUNT IS BEING REGISTERED BY
SECONDARY NUMBER OF THE CUSTOMER.
EXHIBIT 34.A.:
 |
35.
BUT
THE CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST AGAIN IS ASKING FOR ANOTHER TOP UP OF
₱2,000.00PHP INSTEAD OF JUST STARTING ₱200.00PHP FOR NEW ACCOUNT. IT ALSO ASKED FURTHER THAT IF THE CUSTOMER TOP
UP ₱2,000.00PHP, THEN THE OLD ACCOUNT WILL BE UNBLOCK, BUT IT REVEALED THAT THE
DNS OF EXISTING SERVICE PROVIDER WAS BEING TROUBLED AS SUCH WEBSITE ADDRESS
URL/LINK http://philippine1.com/#/register?code=Q8R79O WAS BARELY THE CAUSED, AS THE OLD ACCOUNT
APPEARED AGAIN ON EARLIER WEBSITE ADDRESS URL/LINK ON DECEMBER 2, 2021 AFTER
THE CUSTOMER REPLACED THE DNS OF EXISTING SERVICE PROVIDER THAT IS VERY
DECEIVING AS CHEATING FRAUDS AND BREACHES LACKING INTEGRITY OF THE SKY
INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. THAT DEFAULTED WITHDRAWALS OF THE CUSTOMER.
 |
EXHIBIT 35.A.:
36.
THAT
AS THE ABOVE STATEMENTS OF COMPLAINTS WERE DRAFTED, DATED DECEMBER 8, 2021 A
NEW NUMBER APPEARED KEEP ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL TOP UP RECHARGE THAT IS VERY
ANNOYING FOR REPEATEDLY ASKING TO COMPLETE THE TASK THOUGH I AS THE CUSTOMER INFORMED
ALREADY THAT I HAVE NO IMMEDIATE MONEY FOR THAT ANYMORE, THAT I BARELY USED
LOANS FROM LOANS APPS AND PAID MY LOANS ON LOANS APPS BY ASKING LOANS AGAIN
FROM SOME PEOPLES THAT CARES ON ME, I NEED SUCH MONEY TO PAY MY LOANS AND I
HAVE NO ADDITIONAL MONEY TO TOPS UPS EVERY NOW AND THEN, EVEN IF I HAVE OR I
MAY HAVE, IT IS NOT GOOD TO INVEST FURTHER AS THEIR PLATFORM IS NOT TRANSPARENT
ON THEIR CUSTOMER AND THEY HAVE COMMITTED FRAUDS AND DECEITED WITH BREACHES
ALREADY, SUCH COMPANY WITH ANY OF THEIR REPRESENTATIVE MUST NOT FORCE THEIR
CUSTOMER FOR TOPS UPS, AND THEIR CUSTOMER MUST NOT BE FOOLED BY WRONGFUL
MANIPULATIONS, ET. AL.. THAT THE NEW NUMBER IS +63 926 915 6752 THAT INTRODUCED
HIMSELF/HERSELF AS TRIGAALTMAN, THUS, IT IS FRAUDULENT TO DEPRIVED THEIR OWN
CUSTOMER OF THEIR OWN ACCOUNT.
 |
EXHIBIT 36.A.:
37.
THAT
AS TRIGAALTMAN WAS INCONSISTENT FOR ASKING OLD AND NEW REGISTERED ACCOUNT, AS
SUCH NEW ACCOUNT WAS DENIED BY TRIGAALTMAN.
IT WAS ALSO CHATTED THAT SUCH OLD ACCOUNT WAS BANNED THAT COULD NOT BE
CHECKED BY THE CUSTOMER, BUT THE CUSTOMER MANAGE TO REVEAL WITH SUCH
SCREENSHOTS AND DNS PROBLEM SOLVING.
 |
EXHIBIT 37.A.:
38.
 |
THE OLD ACCOUNT FROZEN PER 4/4 TASK, INSTEAD OF LIQUIDATION AND WITHDRAWAL, IT APPEARED THAT TRIGAALTMAN ADDED A NEW TASK THAT MADE THE 4/4 BECAME 4/5 OF WHICH THEY MADE THE OLD ACCOUNT MORE TROUBLESOME.
EXHIBIT 38.A.:
39.
THAT
THE REPEATED INSISTIONS FOR TOPS UPS FOR RECHARGES ARE FORCIBLE HARRASHMENTS BY
CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST ANITA DE SILVA Y VELASQUEZ AND FOLLOWED BY TRIGAALTMAN
OF SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. OR SKY OR GBM COMPRAS FOR SUCH UNLAWFUL,
UNFAIR, UNRIGHTEOUS AND ILLEGAL CRIMES OF FRAUDS, BREACHES, HARRASHMENTS,
UNLAWFUL ABITRATIONS, UNLAWFUL PROFITEERING, ET. AL.
40.
THE
FRAUDED AND BREACHED ACCOUNT AS THEY INTENDED TO HIDE, TRIGAALTMAN INSISTED FOR
ANOTHER ACCOUNT OF WHICH AS OBVIOUSLY THEY WANT ME TO USE MY SAME NUMBER +639205099532
AS I USED ON MY OLD ACCOUNT FROZEN OF WHICH WAS REGISTERED USING http://philippine1.com/#/register?code=Q8R79O WHILE ANITA VELASQUEZ DE SILVA INSISTED TO
OPEN A NEW ACCOUNT ON https://philippine8.com/#/register?code=EI5HPH WHILE I USED MY NUMBER +639052598917 INSTEAD
OF +639205099532 TO MAINTAIN TRAILS AND DIFFERENCES FROM MY OLD ACCOUNT AS TO
AVOID CONFUSION NOR DECEIT, BUT TRIGAALTMAN INSISTED ANOTHER NEW REGISTRATION
ON https://philippine8.com/#/register?code=7PPCL7 ALTHOUGH MY NUMBER ON NEW ACCOUNT +639052598917
COULD BE OPENED BUT MY NUMBER ON MY OLD ACCOUNT +639205099532 COULD NOT BE
OPENED. THUS, EACH OF THEIR CORRESPONDING WEBSITE LINK/URL HAS ITS OWN UNIQUE
INVITE CODE FOR THEIR OWN COMMISSIONS. INVITE CODE FOR ANITA VELASQUEZ DE SILVA
IS EI5HPH ON NEW ACCOUNT WHILE Q8R79O ON OLD ACCOUNT AND FOR NEW ACCOUNT INVITE
CODE OF TRIGAALTMAN IS 7PPCL7. THUS, THE UNLAWFUL PROFITEERING AND DECEITS WERE
ALSO EXCEEDED AND BEYOND THE CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST AS ANITA VELASQUES DE
SILVA APPLIED FOR APPROVAL ON THE SKY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, OF WHICH SUCH
INFORMED TEN MINUTES DEFROSTING EXCEEDED TEN MINUTES THAT TOOK ABOUT HALF A
DAY, BUT IT BREACHES AND FRAUDED BY THE COMPANY FOR WITHDRAWAL BY THE CUSTOMER.
WHATEVER THE ORGANIZAIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE SKY WITH GBM COMPRAS WITH SKY INTERNATIONAL
TRADING CO. LTD, AMAZON, EBAY, LAZADA AND SHOPEE, ANITA DE SILVA Y VELASQUEZ
PROVIDED AN ID ISSUED IN 2016 WHILE SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. IS NOTED
AS ESTABLISHED BARELY ON AUGUST 1, 2018 WHICH IS VERY CONFUSING ON THE CUSTOMER
AND THAT GBM COMPRAS IS NOT ALSO WRITTEN ON THE SKY PROFILE. ANITA EARLIER
INTRODUCED BARELY WITH HER FIRST NAME THAT SHE IS A HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER PER
HER NUMBER +639705689276 AND INTRODUCED HERSELF ON WHATSAPP NUMBER +63 969 126
4176 AS AN ONLINE CUSTOMER SERVICE
SPECIALIST OF GBM COMPRAS, BUT USING AN ID WITH THE NAME AMAZON BARELY OF WHICH
ONE BARELY OF THE FOUR MENTIONED LARGE ONLINE MALLS, SUCH AS AMAZON, EBAY,
LAZADA AND SHOPEE, WHETHER THE TASKING IS OF SKY OR SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING
CO. LTD. OR GBM COMPRAS THAT ACTS AS MIDDLE COMPANY BETWEEN THE MERCHANTS AND
THE CUSTOMERS, THUS, ANOTHER CASE OF MISREPRESENTATION, IF ANY, WHILE THE
CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY AMAZON IS FOR BARELY ONE YEAR WHETHER ISSUED TO THE NAME
OR TO AS DEFINITION OR DESCRIBING SUCH PLATFORM AS “ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM”
BARELY. THUS, THE WRONGFUL MANIPULATIONS
EXISTED ON SUCH ACCOUNT OF THE CUSTOMER ON THE ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM OF GBM
COMPRAS – SKY – SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. THAT WAS FRAUDED AND
BREACHED, THAT INCLUDED HARRASHMENTS OF TOPS UPS RECHARGES FOR VIRTUAL
PURCHASING DEPOSITS DECEITED WITH OVERPRICED AND FAILURES OF WITHDRAWALS, THEREFORE,
DEFAULTING THE IMMEDIATE MONEY OF THE CUSTOMER.
41.
THAT
EVERYONE IS PROTECTED BY THE LAW, BUT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. A BUSINESS
ENTITY IS ONLY CREATED BY THE LAW THAT MUST NOT ALSO BE ABOVE THE LAW, THAT AS
WITHOUT ANY VALID REASON, THREAT AND INITIMIDATION WERE ALSO CREATED BY THE
CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST FOR UNLAWFUL REVERSAL TO COVER THEIR FRAUDULENT
ACTS AND BREACHES, THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS NOR CASE TO CALL THE POLICE, THEY ARE
THOSE THAT MUST BE POLICED, THUS, AS THE INTRODUCTION OF GBM COMPRAS HAVE BEEN
TRICKEN FOR INFORMATION TO CONFUSE ABOUT THE COMPANY INFORMATION POSTED ON THE
WEBSITE AS SKY OR SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD., WERE BARELY SIMILAR AS
THE AMAZON, LAZADA, EBAY AND SHOPEE WHO AUTHORIZED THEIR COMPANY FOR SUCH
E-COMMERCE PLATFORM THAT IN THE END REVEALED PER CERTIFICATION AS "ONLINE
MALL TASK PLATFORM", WHICHEVER OR WHATEVER THE REGISTERED COMPANY NAME
ALTHOUGH THE ID PROVIDED WAS ISSUE YEAR 2016 USING AMAZON OR AS ITS AFFILIATE.
AS SUCH, LARGE COMPANIES, MUST NOT ALSO BE USED TO THREAT NOR INTIMIDATE ANY
INDIVIDUAL OR CUSTOMER IN BIASE OF ANY OTHER. THUS, THE MERCHANTS PER THEIR
SPECIFIC PRODUCT/S ARE BARELY COMPETING
IN AMAZON, ETC., WHILE THE USES OF E-COMMERCE PLATFORM FOR THEIR PRODUCT/S
RANKINGS AND PROMOTIONS AS THEIR ADVERTISING MEDIA FOR THEIR SALES MUST ALSO BE
IN OBSERVANCE OF HUMANITIES, THUS, IF THESE ARE THE BARELY OBJECTIVE, THEY
WOULD NOT ALLOW OVERPRICING, BUT THE ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM REPEATEDLY
OVERPRICED, AUTOMATED SYSYEM MUST NOT ALSO BE AN EXCUSE FOR HUMANITIES, IN
FACT, THE "ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM" HAD SETTLED THE PENDING
PRODUCTS OF THE MERCHANTS EARLIER COMPLETED, AS SUCH ONLINE LARGE MALLS
DIFFERENCES WITH DIFFERENT PRODUCTS ADVERTISED, NO MATTER HOW LARGE EACH OF
THEIR PARTNERED ONLINE MALLS FOR TASKING, MUST BE LAWFUL FOR AUTOMATED SYSYEM
OPERATIONS WITHOUT VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS, AS SUCH FORCIBLE TOPS UPS FOR
HARRASHMENTS WERE ILLEGAL, IN FACT, SUCH AUTOMATIONS WERE BARELY PROGRAMMED
ALSO BY HUMANS THAT MUST MEAN FOR GOOD HUMANITIES RIGHTS, BUT THE INDIVIDUAL
RIGHTS OF THEIR CUSTOMER WHO INVESTED MONEY ON THEIR "ONLINE MALL TASK
PLATFORM" WAS NOT SETTLED, INSTEAD, THEY FRAUDED AND BREACHED, SO THAT
THEY COULD GAIN PROFITS FROM TOPS UPS RECHARGES AND TASKS ORDERS FROM THE
MERCHANTS, FOR AN INDEFINITE TOPS UPS RECHARGES, THE MANY THE TASKS THE HIGHER
THE COMMISSIONS THAT WERE ALSO REPEATEDLY ANSWERED WERE NOT THE EXCUSES ANYMORE,
COMPLETING INDEFINITE OR AS FRAUDED AND BREACHED UNENDLESS OR UNENDING AND
BASELESS NUMBERS OF TASKS WERE ALSO INTOLERABLE, THUS, ANOTHER CASE FOR
UNLAWFUL ARBITRATION, AS SUCH CAUSED ALSO OF UNLAWFUL PROFITEERING, ET. AL.,
THE SUFFERED STUCKED OF IMMEDIATE MONEY THAT LOOSES THE BUDGET OF THE CUSTOMER FOR
IMMEDIATE USES, ALSO SUFFERED MORE ANNOYANCES, UNCOMFORTABILITIES, UNJUST
VEXATIONS, THREATS, ET. AL. AS HARDSHIP OF STUCKAGE OF IMMEDIATE MONEY HAS
THREATENED OBLIGATIONS ALMOST UNATTENDED, AS SUCH, THE CUSTOMER BARELY BORROWED
FROM LOANS APPS THAT MUST BE PAID WITHIN 7 DAYS, BUT INSTEAD OF USING AND
GAINING FROM SUCH MONEY, THE CUSTOMER, BARELY ASK FROM SOME PEOPLE THAT CARES
FOR ANOTHER LOANS IN ORDER TO PAY THE DUE DATES OF THE LOANS APPS, BUT THE
CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST BARELY KEEP ON ASKING TOPS UPS RECHARGES WITHOUT
CONSIDERATION ON THE NEEDS AND FINANCIAL STATUS OF THE CUSTOMER THOUGH SHE
KNOWS THAT THE CUSTOMER BARELY AVAILED LOANS.
42.
THAT
THE RULES WERE BARELY GIVEN AFTER THE TOP UP RECHARGE OF ₱1,000.00PHP WHICH IS
HIGHER ALREADY THAN THE SAMPLE EXPERIENCED TOP UP RECHARGED OF ₱200.00PHP AND
THE RULES WERE AMBIGOUS WITHOUT SPECIFYING THAT THE DIFFERENCE IS THE PRICE,
THAT MAY HAVE BEEN OVERPRICE, AS SUCH, WAS ASKED IF THERE IS A RISK, BUT WAS
ANSWERED AS NO RISK. THE MONEY WAS STUCKED. AS SUCH TO FINISH WITHIN AN HOUR
WITH SUCH COMPLETION IS VERY ACHIEVABLE, BUT TO BE STUCKED BY OVERPRICING THAT
SATURATED THE MONEY OF THE CUSTOMER WAS UNLAWFUL, UNFAIR, UNRIGHTEOUS AND
ILLEGAL. IF IT IS NORMAL FOR THE COMPANY TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE WHICH DID
NOT SPECIFY AS MAY BE OVERPRICED, AS SUCH DIFFERENCES MAY ALSO CONCERNING
GENDER ISSUES FOR MALE OR FEMALE PRODUCTS, BUT THE CUSTOMER MAY EVEN MAKE IT
UP, TO EVEN CONSIDERS FOR HIS NATURAL WIVES CONCERNS, THUS, AS IT IS BARELY
VIRTUAL SELLING FOR ADVERTISEMENT PURPOSES, AS IT MAY BE ON THE RECORD OF THE
ACCOUNT, WHETHER SUCH PRODUCT/S MAY BE APPLICABLE OR NOT ON THE CUSTOMER, ARE
ALSO DIFFERENCES FOR DECISION TO VIRTUALLY BUY OR NOT, OTHER THAN PRICE MATTER,
THUS, IT IS ALSO NORMAL FOR THE BUYER TO DECLINE THE ORDER, THE MORE IF IT IS
NOT ACHIEVABLE CONSIDERING PRICE MATTER. THUS, THE LEVEL 1 FOR ₱1,000.00PHP
CONSIDERING ADDITIONAL TOP UPS RECHARGES WERE OVER THE LEVEL 1, MUST ALSO THEN
BE CONSIDERED AS NOT SMALL AMOUNT IN CONSIDERATION, THAT MAY HAVE BEEN FOR
LEVEL 2 PRICES OF WHICH THE LEVEL 2 IS ₱3,000.00PHP, AS SUCH NUMBER OF
RECHARGES WHILE ASKING FOR ANOTHER RECHARGE OF ₱2,000.00PHP FOR NEW ACCOUNT
AFTER BREACHES AND FRAUDS WERE VERY DOUBTFUL ANYMORE TO TRY ANOTHER, THE
CUSTOMER BARELY TAKES TOPS UPS RECHARGES AFTER THE FRAUDS AND BREACHES IN ORDER
TO AVOID THE BURDENS OF COMPLAINTS EVEN IF THE CUSTOMER IS THE COMPLAINANT, AS
THE COMPLAINANT IS ALSO THE VICTIM, AS SUCH MAKING THIS AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLAINTS
ALONE BY THE CUSTOMER WAS VERY HARD/DIFFICULT ON PHYSICAL EFFORTS, THOUGHTS AND
EMOTIONS AS A VICTIM, THAT MUST ALSO REQUIRES DAMAGES. THAT AS IF THE CUSTOMER
MAY JUST EVEN WITHDRAW BARELY TO FINISH SUCH ISSUES, THE CUSTOMER MAY NOT BE A
VICTIM IF THE CUSTOMER SUCCESSFULLY WITHDRAW HIS MONEY, BUT THEY KEEP ON
STUCKING/HOLDING THE MONEY WITH SUCH HARRASHMENTS FOR TOPS UPS OF RECHARGING
ADDITIONAL MONEY, WERE INTOLERABLE. AS IF THEY ARE BARELY OPERATING LEGALLY, THE
COMPUTATIONS OF PRICES MUST MEAN THE MORE ON AUTOMATION MUST BE COMPUTED
WITHOUT OVERPRICING, BUT WERE OVERPRICED, BUT AS SUCH, THE TROUBLESOMES WERE
BEING CREATED BY THE ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM OF SUCH COMPANY, AS SUCH
AUTOMATION WERE BARELY PROGRAMED BY THEIR TECHNICAL STAFFS/OFFICERS/PROGRAMMERS,
AS RULES AND POLICIES MUST ALSO BE LAWFUL FOR HUMANITIES CONCERNS, BUT WERE
NOT. THEREFORE, AS SUCH BAD EXPERIENCE SUFFERED BY THE CUSTOMER FROM SUCH
COMPANY WERE UNLAWFUL, UNFAIR, UNRIGHTEOUS AND ILLEGAL. THE PART TIME WORKS WERE WITH MONEY INVESTMENTS
ALSO OF THE CUSTOMER OF WHICH BOTH WORKS/LABOR AND MONEY INVESTMENTS OF THE
CUSTOMER MUST ALSO BE PROTECTED BY THE LAW, AS SUCH COMMITMENT OF UNLAWFUL ACTS
OF FRAUDS AND BREACHES, FOLLOWED BY HARRASHMENTS WITH DECEITS OF MATERIAL
INFORMATION, UNLAWFUL ABITRATIONS WITH UNLAWFUL PROFITEERING, THREATS, ET. AL. THAT
SUFFERED BURDENNED INCLUDING SUCH CONSEQUENCES MUST BE CHARGED FOR RIGHTFUL
DAMAGES IN FAVOUR OF THE CUSTOMER.
43.
NOW
THEREFORE, THE CUSTOMER MISTER EDWIN BALATBAT DIMAANO IS DEMANDING FULL REFUND
OF HIS MONEY WITH DAMAGES AND WITH RIGHTFUL PUNISHMENTS OR PENALTIES CAUSED OF
SUCH CRIMINAL CHARGES, ET. AL.
44.
THUS,
THE AMAZON, EBAY, LAZADA AND SHOPEE MUST ALSO WITHDRAW THEIR AUTHORIZATION
GIVEN TO THE GBM COMPRAS – SKY – SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD – ONLINE
MALL TASK PLATFORM AND AS TO THE FULL EXTENT PUNISHABLE BY LAW THAT THE
CUSTOMER DEMANDS EVEN TO THE SEIZURE/CLOSURE OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE GBM
COMPRAS – SKY – SKY INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO. LTD. – ONLINE MALL TASK PLATFORM,
WITH OTHER ADDENDUM OF COMPLAINTS SUCH AS UNLAWFUL, UNFAIR, UNRIGHTEOUS AND
ILLEGAL CONSPIRACY AND FRAUDULENT CONNIVANCE, ET. AL., AND ANY WITH RELIEF JUST
AND EQUITABLE UNDER THE LAW AND THE PREMISES ARE LIKEWISE DEMANDED FOR
PENALTIES AND DAMAGES.
THAT THESE
STATEMENTS ARE THE TRUTH OF ALL AND ON THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND
BELIEF. THUS, I HEREBY, AFFIX MY
GRAPHICAL SIGNATURE WITH MY SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM (S.S.S.) ID, CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION NUMBER AND OTHER CREDENTIALS ON ______________________ AND/OR ON THE
DATE OF EMAIL AS SENT (FOR SENDING ON DECEMBER 20, 2021), HERE AT THE CITY/TOWN
OF ______________________________________________, PHILIPPINES AND/OR AS AT
LOCATION PER EMAIL SUBMISSION AT DIMAANO RESIDENCE AT 0663 (E222) (PUROK 4) SAN
MIGUEL, HAGONOY, BULACAN, PHILIPPINES 3002.
 |
MISTER EDWIN BALATBAT
DIMAANO THE BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ACCOUNTANCY WITH MASTER OF SCIENCE IN
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND THE HOMEBASE FREELANCE INDEPENDENT GENERAL
CONTRACTOR………....UNIVERSAL/INTERNATIONAL BUSINESSMAN (PART TIMER) (FREELANCER)
(AFFIANT COMPLAINANT
CUSTOMER VICTIM)
SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM (S.S.S.) ID NUMBER: 3341687846
 |
 |
CAREER SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL 13040254,
C.S.C. N.C.R. 12.15.1998,
CAREER SERVICE
SUB-PROFESSIONAL 13040254,
C.S.C . N.C.R. 11.12.1977,
PVT FROM FEU NCR
RCDG RESCOM, PA, 03.10.1996 STANDBY RESERVIST (S.R.),
C/MAJ FROM SACHS
(BUL) 304 CDC, 3RCDU, RESCOM , PA, 03.18.1994 STANDBY RESERVIST (S.R.),
THE AFFIANT LEGAL
GOVERNMENT/STATE PRIVATE COMPLAINANT, JUST THE AD HOC ATTORNEY IN FACT AT LAW
OF MY OWN COMPLAINTS BEFORE/PRIOR THE FISCALS/
OMBUDS/PROSECUTORS/MILITARIES/POLICES,
THE LEGAL
STATE/GOVERNMENT PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINANT VICTIM PLAINTIFF
https://goo.gl/maps/ZwcnAjQySY7ReRQRA
SUBSCRIBED AND
SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _____________________ AT CITY/TOWN OF
__________________________________, PHILIPPINES AND/OR AS SUBSCRIBED BY ONLINE
FILING AND EMAIL SUBMISSION.
I CERTIFY THAT I
HAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED THE AFFIANT (WITH HIS ONLINE FILING AND EMAIL
SUBMISSION) AND I AM CONVINCED THAT HE VOLUNTARY EXECUTED AND UNDERSTOOD HIS
STATEMENT.
______________________________________________
(ADMINISTERING
OFFICER/PROSECUTOR/OMBUDSMAN)
***********
***********
FILE DOCUMENT COPY AVAILABLE TO VIEW EXHIBITS.................
